Instead of analyzing the Dell's, Microsoft's and Apple's of the world, how about learning from a few businesses that went down in flames; see what sunk them, and how you can avoid becoming the spectacular failure that they did.
Disaster #1: Furniture.com
Legacy: Humiliating
Of all the entrepreneur case studies, Furniture.com might be the most famous. The premise was simple: Sell furniture online. Online businesses were becoming the rage, and the founders of Furniture.com wanted a piece of the action. Online stores are usually quite profitable due to lower fixed costs. Low fixed costs + furniture sales.. A match made in heaven right? Unfortunately, shipping a 200 pound couch ends up being expensive (who would've thought?). The shipping costs alone sliced and diced the potential profit margins for this new online startup. But shipping costs weren't the only problem.
Furniture.com failed to provide any meaningful sales advice to its customers. It also lacked a selection of furniture that anybody other than your great grandparents would want in their home. Unsurprisingly, it went down in flames.
What you can learn
A website is not a business; it's a medium, that helps put you in touch with potential customers. If your products are junk, nobody is going to buy them. Period. And if you are able to sell something, make sure you factor in all of the factors that are going to eat at your profit margins. Furniture.com never took a holistic enough approach, and as a result, they went under.
Disaster #2: Webvan.com
Legacy: Embarrassing
Webvan.com is one of the entrepreneur case studies that is studied in many MBA programs. The company was designed to sell groceries online, and have them delivered to customers' houses. The business model sounded reasonable, but Webvan didn't account for several possible problems:
- Customers typically like to feel their vegetables, fruit, and meats, and hand-select their food
- Customers did not value the convenience of having their groceries delivered enough to pay for it
These issues ended up being the least of Webvan's problems however. Webvan decided it would be a good idea to begin building large distribution centers before fully validating their business (by validating, we mean accruing enough paying customers). Each new distribution center ended up costing Webvan around $30 million dollars. Each center had the latest and greatest information systems, and seemingly everything the company would need to ship out groceries successfully. These centers chewed plenty of Webvan's investment capital, and were a major reason they ran out of money.
Customers never truly warmed up to Webvan the way investors expected. It didn't help that Webvan was being run by a pack of executives with virtually no previous knowledge of the grocery industry. Without this knowledge, Webvan was obliterated by smaller supermarkets that were more in tune with customers' needs and wants.
What you can learn
Don't invest in something you don't understand. Warren Buffet lives by this rule, and you should too. It applies to your time, as well as your dollars. When starting a business, ensure that you are fully versed in the market, and that you understand your customers' needs. You can get this type of information by collecting feedback from them (see here).
Lastly, remember that fancy CRM systems and other technologies are designed to augment your business; they can not be relied upon as sole providers of customers, or sales.
Disaster #3: Barings Bank
Legacy: Shame
Barings bank was the largest merchant bank in London, until one employee sunk them. The bank had a star trader, Nick Leeson. Nick's job was arbitraging; he basically bought futures contracts in one market, and sold them on another market. The difference in price when he sold them was minimal, but the sheer volume of his transactions created a profit. Unfortunately, Nick thought he would start trying to hit home runs, instead of singles. Rather than selling the contracts at small gains, he thought he would wait until a larger gain could be realized. This went on and on, and the bets kept getting bigger. Leeson was also in charge of auditing, and he ended up auditing his own transactions! He used his auditing authority to mislead company executives into believing that he was actually making a profit, when in fact, he had lost huge sums of money. In 1994, he reported a 'gain' of £102 million, when in fact, he had lost £200 million. Not surprisingly, Barings collapsed soon after.
What you can learn
Sometimes it only takes one employee to tear down a company. This doesn't have to be viewed from a purely financial lens; if one of your employees actively tarnishes your company's image on different social media networks, the effects can also cause catastrophic damage. Make sure that your employees are projecting the brand you want your business to be known for. And as you've seen, it's a good idea to have objective auditors, rather than employees that audit themselves. You don't need to be a cheapskate with spending, but as a new startup, your financial capital is your lifeblood. Make sure you know about every place it's going.
Please press Tweet if you enjoyed this!
Prefer Facebook? Click to Like this!
Get Social!
Add us to: Twitter | Facebook